Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Forum Jump  
Difference between 1 instance and a tabbet multi instance
Last post Sat, Aug 06 2016 by Paul, 7 replies.
Options
Go to last post
Posted on Thu, Aug 04 2016 08:19
by ghuinink
Joined on Tue, Jan 16 2007, Posts 77

Hi,

My goal is to have one Template on a Slave PC, which stays unchanged and connects to all my projects.

In de VEP6 manual i see an Orchestral Template with each instrument section assigned to a unique instance in the Server.  A tabbed setup so to speak.What is the advantage of using this setup compared to loading all instruments in one instance?

And what would be best for my preferred way of working?(You need to manage your multi thread setup and such, which makes it more complicated.)

Please elaborate :)

Geert.

Tags: VE Pro 6
Posted on Thu, Aug 04 2016 09:11
by Paul
Joined on Sat, Aug 03 2002, Vienna, Posts 11048

Helo Geert, 

The best template is the one you feel most comfortable with. 

I just showed off the tab feature in the manual, as it is one way of keeping things organized. 

Using color-codes and folder structure combined with the GROUP features and the collapsable channels is another one. 

You can definitely keep everything in one instance (if you´re not stuck with AU), and always start with the highest possible thread setting on a slave computer (leave 1 Thread available for the Sequencer on the master computer, if you´re working with a one computer setup). 

Best, 
Paul

Paul Kopf
Product Manager - Vienna Symphonic Library
Posted on Thu, Aug 04 2016 14:54
by ghuinink
Joined on Tue, Jan 16 2007, Posts 77

Hi Paul,

ah, so it is just a way of organizing things, and has no clear advantages or disadvantages.

Thanks for your time :)

 

Geert.

Posted on Fri, Aug 05 2016 13:40
by LuCsa
Joined on Sat, Dec 19 2015, Vienna, Posts 108

Originally Posted by: Paul Go to Quoted Post
You can definitely keep everything in one instance (if you´re not stuck with AU), and always start with the highest possible thread setting on a slave computer (leave 1 Thread available for the Sequencer on the master computer, if you´re working with a one computer setup).

Highest thread setting, in that I choose 7 if I have a quad-core processor with Hyperthreading (4*2-1=7)?

Is there a recommendation to keep the number of VE(P) instances at a minimum?

kind regards,
Lukas

i7-6700K (4 @ 4.0GHz w/ HT) - 16GB RAM
Windows 10 Home 64bit - Reaper - Finale 2012
---
VI Pro - SE Vol. 1 bundle - SE Vol. 2 bundle- MIRx Sage
Posted on Fri, Aug 05 2016 14:29
by Paul
Joined on Sat, Aug 03 2002, Vienna, Posts 11048

Hi Lukas, 

You can use VE PRO any way you like. Less instances will result in a SLIGHTLY slower CPU usage.

Best, 
Paul

Paul Kopf
Product Manager - Vienna Symphonic Library
Posted on Sat, Aug 06 2016 12:06
by LuCsa
Joined on Sat, Dec 19 2015, Vienna, Posts 108

Hello Paul,

thank you. But does VE(P) profit from hyperthreading? It seems so as you're talking about "threads" and not cores...?

kind regards,
Lukas

i7-6700K (4 @ 4.0GHz w/ HT) - 16GB RAM
Windows 10 Home 64bit - Reaper - Finale 2012
---
VI Pro - SE Vol. 1 bundle - SE Vol. 2 bundle- MIRx Sage
Posted on Sat, Aug 06 2016 15:17
by Paul
Joined on Sat, Aug 03 2002, Vienna, Posts 11048

Hi Lukas, 

I´m not a programmer, I referred to the Thread setting in the Preferences. 
AFAIK, VE PRO benefits from hyperthreading. 

Best, 
Paul

Paul Kopf
Product Manager - Vienna Symphonic Library
You cannot post new threads in this forum.
You cannot reply to threads in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.