Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Forum Jump  
MIR Pro 3D: Natural Volume Discrepancies
Last post Thu, Nov 24 2022 by Dietz, 5 replies.
Options
Go to last post
Posted on Sun, Sep 18 2022 21:20
by Pixelpoet1985
Joined on Fri, Dec 23 2016, Germany, Posts 359

I've noticed that there are differences between the instrument profiles in MIR Pro and the overview which is listed in the manual (https://www.vsl.info/en/manuals/mir-pro-3d/natural-volume).

What are the correct numbers? From my experience I would say that the list is correct. Would be nice to have some clarification here. Thanks.

Posted on Wed, Nov 16 2022 14:06
by Pixelpoet1985
Joined on Fri, Dec 23 2016, Germany, Posts 359

Bump!

Would be nice to have some clarification here. The volumes in MIR Pro are not the same as in the overview, e.g. Flute (18.5 vs 15.5), Horn (11 vs 10) or Dimension Violins (15 vs 12). Which numbers are correct?

Posted on Wed, Nov 16 2022 20:23
by Dietz
Joined on Tue, Aug 06 2002, Vienna / Europe, Posts 8106

As far as I know the values implemented in the most recent version of MIR 3D (build 556 and higher) should be the correct ones, but I'll double check. Thanks for the hint!

/Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
Posted on Thu, Nov 24 2022 09:03
by Pixelpoet1985
Joined on Fri, Dec 23 2016, Germany, Posts 359

Thanks! I have the latest version installed, but the values still differ from the overview. Or is the overview not correct?

I also have another question off-topic:
Is the natural volume pre or post MIR?

I'm asking, because I think it's "better" to have the volume reduced before MIR... I can't remember if the previous version of MIR handled this differently. For example: When comparing to the SYNCHRON-ized instruments, the volume should be reduced rather in VI Pro, say, before MIR. Maybe I'm only imagining and it's irrelevant at which point you reduce the volume. ;)

Posted on Thu, Nov 24 2022 09:53
by Dietz
Joined on Tue, Aug 06 2002, Vienna / Europe, Posts 8106

Originally Posted by: Pixelpoet1985 Go to Quoted Post
[...] Maybe I'm only imagining and it's irrelevant at which point you reduce the volume. ;)

It is, due to the fact that (non-dynamic) convolution is a linear process. :-)

/Dietz - Vienna Symphonic Library
You cannot post new threads in this forum.
You cannot reply to threads in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.