To contrast the first MIRx demo, here's something different, and Stravinski-ish in places.
[url=http://guybacos.com/audio/Rise%20of%20the%20Wild.mp3]Rise of the Wild[/url]
Guy
180,822 users have contributed to 42,142 threads and 254,366 posts.
In the past 24 hours, we have 2 new thread(s), 4 new post(s) and 76 new user(s).
Hey Guy,
I love the atmosphere of this piece. Your string work is fabulous as is the use of small crescendos and dimenuendos - nice. Pretty harmonically sophisticated piece and good build up of tension. I also like how you use the entire orchestra, but not all at once - it makes things very interesting to listen to - you want to listen just to foind out what happens next.
Corte
Hi Guy,
This actually sounded a little more Ravelian to me, but I just wanted to know again how coloured the mix was. Is it just MIRx again with some Suite compression and excitement?
Thanks. I'm not trying to be difficult, I just wanted to know how much of the demo was MIRx and how much other mix-magic. One more question: Do you go with the default 'Natural Volume' for the balanced mix in the MIRx demos you did, or did you use your own individual levels? That is, I don't mean the final ouput level.
@Errikos said:
Thanks. I'm not trying to be difficult, I just wanted to know how much of the demo was MIRx and how much other mix-magic. One more question: Do you go with the default 'Natural Volume' for the balanced mix in the MIRx demos you did, or did you use your own individual levels? That is, I don't mean the final ouput level.
No problem, I understand where you're coming from. Yes, I used the natural volume on each instrument for both MIRx demos, I find it very helpful.