Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Forum Jump  
2014 quad-core Mac Pro vs 2014 15" MacBook Pro retina
Last post Sun, Sep 28 2014 by Oguz Sehiralti, 4 replies.
Options
Go to last post
Posted on Sun, Sep 28 2014 05:22
by JYandel
Joined on Thu, Dec 23 2010, Posts 4
Hey all, I'm trying to decide about replacing my 2010 iMac which is showing its age. I have a 2012 MacBook Pro (non-retina) with 16gb ram, and a custom built fusion drive as my slave. The Mac Pro has obviously been a staple in music production, but I'm thinking the dual graphics cards might be overkill, since I don't do any gaming or video work.

My choices are the 3.7ghz quad core MP with 16gb of ram (will upgrade later as needed) or 2.8ghz quad core i7 15" MacBook pro retina for my master machine. Both machines are sexy. I like the portability of the MBPr and the display is gorgeous. I like the higher speed of the MP but as I stated earlier the video cards are kind of unnecessary for what I do, which is composing music for games and film (finishing up school so I'm hoping for more work).

Any advice would be great!


Jonathan
Posted on Sun, Sep 28 2014 06:39
by Oguz Sehiralti
Joined on Mon, Dec 03 2012, Helsinki / Finland, Posts 47

How about a full spec'd 27 inch iMac?

And there are rumours that a new mac mini will come in a while, which might have the same specs as the Macbook pro you mentioned, sans the screen. And also the broadwell chips are around the corner. There is always new technology coming up...

But seriously speaking, you didn't write what kind of workload are you looking for. The MBP might be just fine but won't the screen will feel small after a while? Also, 16 gbs of ram might not be enough in the long run. You could also make your current Macbook your master and look for a beefier slave that can have at least 32 gigs of ram, just to be future proof.

Posted on Sun, Sep 28 2014 13:29
by JYandel
Joined on Thu, Dec 23 2010, Posts 4
Thanks for the response. As for the screen, I would be getting an external 4k monitor. The fully spec'd iMac wouldn't be a bad idea either, but I've read on this forum that some of the users don't like the fusion drive, maybe because it doesn't give them control of where their sample libraries are stored? I would have it custom built with flash storage anyway.
Posted on Sun, Sep 28 2014 15:07
by Oguz Sehiralti
Joined on Mon, Dec 03 2012, Helsinki / Finland, Posts 47

Yes, the fusion drive doesn't seem to be a good solution for our purposes. But the thunderbolt port should be good for sample streaming also.

You cannot post new threads in this forum.
You cannot reply to threads in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.