Originally Posted by: Pixelpoet1985 
Some lower instruments (e.g. dimension horns, dimension cellos) sound a bit boomy. I understand that's because of the close miking at the Silent Stage. Was there already some EQ applied to the dry samples to overcome the proximity effect? Would a high-pass filter in the MIR Pro Room EQ be a good option or are there better options? I think you already made the best you can do with the Room EQ, but it's still boomy.* * I read about the Abbey Road Reverb Trick where you high-pass at 600 and low-pass at 10000. Would this make sense in the Room EQ in general for all instruments, or is this trick only helpful with reverb tails? I think that the wet part in MIR Pro is ER + tail, isn't it?
All of this depends a lot on the context of the composition, its arrangement and the programming, of course. The MIRx-specific "Characters" are meant to take care for the direct signals. If the room's output seems to be too boomy, then feel free to bring down the offending frequency ranges - after all that's why there's the RoomEQ, actually. ;-)
I never trusted the legend of the "Abbey Road Trick", though. A room must sound terrible if I really have to cut its frequency range to that extremes, especially in an orchestral recording.
Oh, and there's no "ER and tail" separation in MIR Pro. What you hear are the complete, unvarnished impulse responses from each hall. :-)
Quote:For my taste the Appassionata strings are too wet, they are around 40, and more than Orchestral or Dimension Strings which are at approx. 30. Shouldn't they be drier? Maybe there is a mistake?
If it sounds wrong for you - change it! :-) That's the beauty of dry sampling without baked-in room. It don't see a mistake there, though.
Quote:When activating MIRx, some instruments (e.g. trumpet, flute) are switched to solo position by default. No problem, but couldn't this be changed?
Some character EQs are "messed up". In general, the MIRx character EQs are at the bottom of the character EQ drop-down list. Now we have some at the top of the list (e.g. Dimension Violins). Again, not a problem, but maybe it's a bug.
Yes, those are oversights which happened during the final software implementation of my settings. I asked VSL's software engineers to take care for these little blemishes just before the release, but obviously my request went unnoticed. I'll point them out again, but please don't expect a fix in the near future.
Quote:Also some positions are not clearly named/assigned, e.g. there is Flute 1 and Flute 3 (1B). Where is Flute 2?
The Instrument Profile "Flute 2" is for Vienna Instrument's second flute. "Flute 3 (1B)" is a virtual double of Flute 1 (thus the label "1B"). I know, all those instruments can get a bit confusing. ;-)
All the best,