Well, the difference is that I now use Kontakt 6.2.
I have one PLAY instance, and a few Spitfire Labs instances. They used to get a long with each other. I know, there can be a million reasons.

I'll try sending a crash report next time.

Also, what is interesting. When idling VEPro says whatever e.g. 7% CPU load - someting that seems right - however, the activity monitor says more than 100% percent load. That is certainly strange.

Since upgrading to version 7 I have seen a lot more crashes and program freezes.

The frustrating thing is that I do not know where to begin troubleshooting - and I do not have days and days to engage in it either.

So far I am running only a local template, with 128GB RAM on Mojave (Logic Pro), 99% Kontakt (6.20) instances, maybe one with PLAY and one with Spitfire Labs.

It already starts by the fact that if the setup is left idling, after 24 hours it will have crashed miserably, ususally preceeded by a program freeze with unusually heightened CPU usage (and not triggered by any action).

Sometimes it also crashes immediately when adding/replacing a random Kontakt instrument patch.

The problem is just that there are no distinct ways to reproduce this. It just seems that there is a general instability to VE Pro that is new. Unless someone has an idea lightbulb coming on all I can say/ask is: Please turn your future efforts back to stability. VE Pro used to be one of the more stable components in whole music setup, now it is a fun-killer.

Originally Posted by: marnix

Hi Crescendo,

the /etc folder resides on root level, is by default invisible and will indeed not yield any results during a system wide search.

Have you tried to access it by selecting "Go to folder..." in the Finders "Go" Menu, typing in "/etc" and confirming?

Best, Marnix

The file was not in there. I don't use spotlight since it never finds anything (I ue Find Any File, way better). I did some research and I found the file in the location you mentioned - but only on my backup drive. A little while ago I made a clean re-install of the system and backed everything up. While doing that I moved from El Capitan to Sierra. The new system installation obviously did not produce a "sysctl.conf". It must therefore be specific to VE-Pro. Since it is in such a exotic location I would not have known that it belongs to VE-Pro and therefore did not know it needs to be copied along with all the other files in Application Support, Preferences etc...

Now, since "sysctl.conf" is back at its place I can open VE-Pro and the message about osascript has not appeared again so far.

Originally Posted by: marnix

Now please select "sysctl.conf" in this folder,

no such file... I did a system wide search (including protected system files) and it seems not to exist.

There is only a sysctl.conf.5 within usr/share/man/man5/ - I don't think it is what we are looking for.

I am getting this osascript message now too every time I start VE-Pro 6 (latest version).
This happened right after I made a fresh install with Mac OS Sierra (used El Capitan before).

I would appreciate some help how to get rid of it.

Sometimes, and these things just happen, there is a small glitch in the network and the connection between host and slave is being temporarily disturbed.

On the host, VE-Pro thinks the connection disconnected, on the slave it thinks it is still active.
 Just to get the connection window up on the host takes about 5 minutes... Then even after forcibly changing the instances on the slave to "disconnected" and trying to reconnect from the host results in an infinite spinning wheel of death.

The only way out of this is to force quit VE-Pro and Logic.

I would really wish to see this:

- A more intelligent re-connecting - and if that is not possible,
- VE-Pro to be more communicate: What is it trying to do that it can't do?
- A safety mechanism for connecting attempts to prevent being in a loop for too long. E.g. after x cycles or seconds of trying to do y, quit the process.

(Logic 10.1, VE-Pro, new Mac Pro + Mac Pro 2008, Mac OS 10.10.3)

I don't think it is a sound card issue (using MOTU Ultralite here). It must be something somewhere between MacOSX/Kontakt 5.3.1/VE-Pro/Orchestral Tools. For a possible solution they probably need to get together in some way and do the trouble shoot in a groupe effort... IMO...

Well, at least right now it works for me under Kontakt 5.3.0 while everything else is in its latest version. It just won't guarantee that it will work in future versions of Kontakt or even the other involved components...

Yes, I had the same problem. But interestingly Kontakt 5.3.1 only had the problem from inside VE-Pro.
If I loaded a Kontakt instance directly from within Logic there were no issues. I also ended up reverting to Kontakt 5.3.0

It seems to have rectified itself.

Still, I find it scary, and I would like to know what that error code "????" means and how to avoid such things in future...

Suddenly, when I restarted my machine today, no information from the eLicenser key was possible to be read. There was a non-sensical error message "????". I have downloaded and installed the latest version of the software.

Conveniently, the eLicenser web site does not list options to contact support.

Can anyone please help?

I am experiencing hanging notes again after it has been working fine for quite a while.

I am using the Multiport-Layer with Logic 9.1.8 on Mac OS 10.7.5 with the current version of VE-Pro 5 and Kontakt 5 (latest version).

The library producing the issues is LASS but with both VE-Pro and the Multiport Layer involved, maybe someone here has some ideas what to do about this?

i know about the issue with bouncing - I would just like to have some instruction on how to set up the IAC scenario in VE-Pro...

As long as that brings actually relief from the hanging notes I'd like to try this out.

It looks like I have it working - I duplicated the Multiport Layer File with anew name and imported it onto a new layer and then copied it from there into the mixer layer. Then I had to re-name each Multi-Instrument (VE 01 etc.) into something like VE2 01 etc. so I would not get confused when re-assigning the external MIDI tracks. This works so far without a crash.

But - I too have massive problems with hanging notes and I do not think that my system is on overload at this point.

I have worked with IAC on standalone PLAY instances before - but I don't know how that would work with VE-Pro? I also would like to have some more detailed information on this. I really need to get rid of the hanging notes as well.

How can I use the Multi-Port Layer on two instrument tracks? I would like to connect one of the tracks to an instance on the main computer and then another instrument track to an instance on a slave computer each utilizing multiple ports - or - split the multiple ports between them.

Can this be done and how?

When I select the items of the Multi-Port Layer, copy them and paste them again Logic crashes instantly!

As stated above, in this particular setup I am not using any slave machines (though sometimes I do).

(Yes I am on a Mac (8 core)) I am already running VE-Pro with one thread - adding more results only in higher CPU usage - I think I stated this already above.

What I am finding now is that when I use only one VE-Pro instance, I can get the CPU down to about 30%. As soon as I add another instance (Even if this instance is loaded with only one Kontakt instance and one single instrument) it jumps to about 50%. A third instance will add again about 20% more.

Still, why would any software that is idling ever use 80% of the CPU power, regardless the configuration? That is my question here.

What I am doing is all on the main computer. No slaves in this setup.

Still, when there is absolutely no action, when it is all idle, it should not consume a lot of CPU - I think at this point it would be nice if one of the VSL developers would chime in in with some clarifying words and perhaps some advice what to do on the user side.

BTW, my VE Pro instances (I have 2 - one monster instance with 16 ports, one extra for one single PLAY instance (loaded with 2 instruments - I thought it would be wise to keep PLAY separate?) are decoupled, using two buffers (increasing/decreasing the buffers do not change the scenario).
It certainly is not about the size of the template, i have been using similarly large (and bigger) templates before in different setups.

If I can't get this worked out so I can use multiple ports without the high CPU usage, I will have decide against VE Pro 5 and go with version 4 and set it up in the "old" ways. Sure would be nice with multiple ports and v5...

Not in this template - only Kontakt instances.

Unfortunately there is no change if I set it to the above numbers. except that the CPU usage increases dramatically when setting the processing threads from 1 to 8.

Regardless of these settings, when idling, shouldn't VE-Pro not be around a very low number, like 2-3%? I mean what on earth would have to be processed there?

Sound card: MOTU Ultralite
I/O Buffer: 256
Process Buffer: medium
Processing Threads: Automatic

Any more things that you think would be relevant?

BTW. When I click to go into the preferences dialog on VE Pro the CPU usage drops to 30%. As soon as I leave the preferences window, the CPU usage goes back up.

I am currently trying out VE Pro 5 - attempting to take advantage of the environment layer that allows multiple ports.

I have one large VE Pro instance with 16 instances of Kontakt. It is - when not connected - idling around 5% but as soon as I connect it to Logic it jumps to 80% (with no further action, no playing or editing in Logic). Can someone please explain to me why this occurs and how I could possibly lower the CPU usage? Obviously something is not quite right. The total memory usage for VE Pro is 10.2 GB on a 18GB system. I still have plenty of headroom.

VE Pro is currently set to 1 processor per instance - if I choose 2 or more the CPU percentage goes even further up dramatically. Kontakt is set to multiprocessing.

____________________________________________________________
Mac Pro 3.1 8 core, Mac OS 10.6.8, Logic 9.1.6, 18GB RAM, all is 64 bit.

thanks for crarifying!

although, when i add midi automation (cc) (for a test i used volume automation), it did not have any effect on the tracks with the Event Input Plugin - only on the track with the actual ve-pro instrument plugin but then of course i don't have access to the ports...

I got the VE-Pro 5 Demo version - Now I am trying to wrap my head around this...

Before I try to delve into that thing with the Environment, I wanted to try out MIDI ports with the Audio/Event Plugin.

So far I got it all working. But...

Is it correct that any automation data sent to a port is being ignored (why?)? And that raises the question - If I use one designated Audio/Event Plugin track for automation how do I select the ports (multiple ports)? So far it I can only have one Audio/Event Plugin going to ONE port. But of course I would need to send automation data to any midi channel on ANY port - is this not possible with this setup? Not to mention that it seems not very practical to have automation data on a separate track...

I find this confusing. Can someone shed some light on it? That would be great.

ok, i checked the manual... at first glance it looks very involved and seems to be not just a plug'n'play thing - but i guess that is all that can be done without changing the actual AU plugin specifications - hello apple...!

now, if i did that (get ve-pro5 and used the above method) - and if i was able to reduce the number of ve-pro instances from 19 to let's say 4 - would that give me a noticable advantage regarding performance? - and does ve pro 5 already has improved perfomance over version 4?

my questions are mostly concerning heavy use of K5 instances with in VE-Pro (Currently I am running 14 VE-Pro 4 instances with one K5 instance each):

- Are there any performance improvments in version 5 (how it handlesmulti processors etc)?

- Version 5 states that now multiple ports can be used even with Logic, eliminating the 16 channel cap - How does that work and how do you set this up?

Thanks in advance!

are your ve pro instances coupled? i would de-couple them and then try to save again.

it looks like it is a smoother way of sailing when you manually save your mframes and viframes instead of having them connected to your logic project.