I'll reply myself!!

I didn't see that you only provide expression maps for the Basic presets. Sorry!

Hi

You have created maps for this library, but somehow it doesn't work at all here!

(Why can't we just drag in screenshots????)

Let me give you an example: In Cubase I have this 1. violin track routed to my PC Server with VEPro 7 and all my string libraries. In the Expression map window I load the map you supply and here the KS for Sustain is C#0 + C1

In the VI it's C0+F#0+C1.

It's an error isn't it?

Can you help???

Hi

Yes I know that CC's are just CC's.

The problem is that I have, for a long time, used CC2 as VelXF and in the Synchron Strings FX this is the case, as the CC1 is used as an articulation switch.

So my asking was specific about any conflicts in the Synchron Strings Pro that could be the result if I would use CC1.

It's really easy to edit the Synchron Strings FX to do what I want.

Best Stig

Ah okay!

I thought it was the default patches I had loaded!

You are right of course!

Hi

I'm trying to integrate the use of the Synchron Strings Pro and Synchron Strings Elite a little bit, and just want to hear if any of you have ran into problems trying to change the CC used for Vel. XF on the Pro to CC1?

Regards 

Stig Christensen MUSICMIND

Well I don't have crashes and run all my plug-ins decouple both in Logic, Cubase and S1.

But it's a mess with the wrong CC numbers!!

What is going on?

Hi Paul

I think you got away far too easy here!
I don't need to "feel" anything in this matter!

What I am after is the most efficient set-up meaning, will VEPro run more efficiently with say 3 or 4 instances, each holding 30 - 50 instruments - Kontakt and SY Player - OR with every instrument in it's own instance, making around 100 - 150 instances.

Naturally not all instruments are loaded all the same time, many of them will just stay idle, waiting to be launched.
So my Q is: Will that amount of instances 100 - 150, even if 30% of them will hold an instrument that is disabled, bring VEPro 7 to its knees or is the load on the system equal to the other set-up, with 3 or 4 instances holding all the instruments with around 30 to 50 each?

Best Regards Stig

Hi

This just plays really bad together with the maps from Babylonwaves, which all starts on C-2, using the full range of the midi system.

So it forces me to edit all of your maps or the 450 maps that I already have loaded from Babylonwaves.
And it's impossible - at least to me - to find a way to do these edits with the help of an app. it's really annoying to experience the little interest developpers in general - and you are one of the good guys, I know - shows in trying to make their product play nice together with all the rest.
I am not the only one using far to much time on setting things in system, time that goes from my projects.
Sorry for letting of the steam!

Hi

I try to find the best way to set-up my DAW. Currently it's Nundo/Logic but I have been looking to Studio One a lot lately.

I have one MacPro Traschcan and 2 servers both running VEPro 7. I have been longing to simplify my set-up for a long time and I want to keep the servers but I constantly switch between a set-up with 3 instances on server 1 holding woodwinds, brass and strings, and 1 instance on server 2 holding all percussion. This is the set-up I use with Nuendo. With Logic I want to take the simple route, one instrument/instance, but I have quite a lot libraries so it will take some time to set-up.
And then to the question: Is there any update to the question, about which way is the right one? At least is the instrument/instance solution viable with around 200 instances?

Regards

Stig Christensen MUSICMIND

Okay

Thanks!

Hi Andi

When I change the root note in the little box (please see picture), ALL my maps - around 220 - are changed so the lowest note is set to C0.
I havn't seen any other maps using C0 as the lowest key, they all use C-2. I think all maps from Art Conductor starts out on C-2. I also think all Spitfire Maps will take use of the lowest keys.
What are the reason for your choice of C0 as the lowest key?

Regards Stig Christensen MUSICMIND

Hi

I was glad when I found out that you have made expression maps for my new library: The Elite Strings.

But they don't work, because you can't have a key switch in the play range, and that is the case in the violin/viola map, where you have used F4, G4, A4, A#4, B4 and C5 as triggers. Transposing them 2 octaves up, will work.

Thought you might wanted to know.

Regards Stig Christensen MUSICMIND

Hi

Can the on/off button on the folder strip be automated?

And why not? 

Hi Paul

Yes I know, but the "turn on via MIDI" is really a workflow enhancer I think.

I will keep on crossing my fingers! ;-)

Hi

I have been asking for this before:

"By the way - are the much talked about feature, to be able turn on channels in VEPro7 by incoming MIDI, a feature you maybe will implement in the future?"

Hope you will answer! ;-)

Regards Stig

Thanks.

By the way - are the much talked about feature, to be able turn on channels in VEPro7 by incomming MIDI, a feature you maybe will implement in the future?

Best Stig

Hi

Working on my template, and can't find any vibrato in this library:  Synchronized Dim. Brass trumpets
Is that true?

Well I just wanted to be able to change the mix presets for all my WW or Brass at one go, always feel that my life is running through my fingers, when I have to deal with all these endless edits on every channel.

Hi

Building a huge template in VEPro 7. I would like to be able to switch between MIX presets in the Synchron Player by automation send from Nuendo. Is that possible?
Is it possible to assign a midi event to switch between Wide Room Mix to Classic Room Mix? 

Hi

I think that Synchron Strings 1 has one problem: The dynamics are a bit limited, even when using CC2.

Funny enough I think it's the ppp that is difficult to achieve. Now I have tried this: In the Synchron Player select the Control Tab and switch Expression from CC11 to CC2. Then set the value "-inf" to -8. Now you can use CC2 to create really heavy volume changes, consisting of not only CC11 but also CC2. I think it returns the FULL control to the DAW and the use of CC2.

I would like to hear what you think about this, are there any "hidden" problems that I haven't seen?

Regards Stig

Hi

I experience a lot of interest in the questions around sample delay in the context with a DAW and explicit in the discussion about using expression maps = one instrument pr. track or the other which uses several tracks, holding one articulation for one instrument. The argumentation for the latter is that the delay of the sample is different for a long sample than for a short sample and therefor it's necessary to split instruments between several tracks because you can ONLY set the track delay (surprise) pr. track.

I have many - all I think - VSL string libraries and I really like the Synchron Strings / Synchron Strings Pro combo. So I decided to try to find the delay in Synchron Strings for longs and shorts, and found to my own surprise that in my system there are around 30ms delay from the midi event is send to VEPro and the audio "hits" Cubase. And what was surprising was, that it was the SAME delay, regardless which sample I chose. And it's in a play back situation with delay compensation ON of course.

Can anyone confirm that this is the case: that the sample delay is the same regardless articulation?

If this is the case, there are no reason to use separate tracks if the reason is to be able to handle the sample delay. Use one track, articulation maps and set the track delay to -30, and all samples from Synchron Strings will play spot on.

Thanks a lot!

I new there had to a way.

Hi

Using Synchronized Dimension Brass I, I was expecting that the Bass Trombone range would go up to a notated F5 (sounding Eb5), but the range stops at D5 (sounding C5).
Why? 

Can it be altered somehov?

I just a half step more! ;-)

Ok Fine!

Thanks

I wanted to control the legato/long attack-marcato with CC3 and found it already in use.

Can you recommend a CC for that?