Hi Paul,
thank you for investigating!

Best regards,
Vadim

Dear VSL, please check and fix it! VePro really not works with last versions of LCC. If I install last version of LCC, I see this every day:
https://youtu.be/xCMHZMcw5H0
https://youtu.be/sB_ou63zRJY

last month my slaves also frequently loose keys on macOS with last LCC versions... For  me helps roll back to previous versions of LCC - try to install, for example, 6.11.3.1242 or something

Hi!

The work of the VePro can be more economical for CPU. At the moment there is a bottleneck in that each instance back to the host via the stereo (take it at least, because mono is not considered). That is if we have 50 instances on a slave, each must be returned to the host by 50 stereo pairs. And if there was an opportunity for tasks of playback of an arrangement without brakes, to sum up all signals from instances and to return to a host one stereo pair only, I think it would strongly unload both slaves and a host. In practice, it may look like this: a plugin in the host that returns the sum of instances from the server by default. And if we want more (for example, for stems rendering), then open it returns from individual instances and, optionally, from individual outputs of each instance. And in the arrangement window it will look more compact - all returns from VePro in one place.

I periodically have same trouble on macOS. So, popping window fixing it, thanks for a hint. Is it possible to fix it in MIR?

No, it seems ok - as you can hear in att. mp3
did you update a library? there are updates 1 and 2 on the MyVSL page

Let's look at it this way. It's not even a matter of patience and a few seconds.
Suppose we have an instrument that has 6RR. and we have the pieсe with two phrases played by this instrument: the first phrase contains 4 notes, and the second - 2 notes. For example, between them a big break, a minute.
Graphically it looks like this: 1234 <1min> 56
Let's say we edit the final piece of music and several times in a row we start listening right before the notes 56 (and not listen to first notes). If it is not possible to record RR reset event immediately before the notes 56, and an automatic reset of the RR depends only on the start/stop of transport with the edit we'll hear 1234 <1min> 12, but mixdown is 1234 <1min> 56. In other words, the user is not able to get on the mixdown what he heard when editing - this is an uncontrollable situation...

how can I convey this phrase to my customers, for whom deadlines are important?))


but seriously, if a program is written in such a way that the user has to wait for it, it is wrong programming. This program should wait for the user, not he her. The computer is designed to unload a user and help him, and not to keep him waiting, don't you? There is RR reset button for such cases in any sampling engine: user can record an event of pressing this key to any place of midi part and it keep him from waiting.

Hi!

How to reset a Round Robin in Sy percussion? Each time I press play I hear a different variant...
https://youtu.be/xh5PjX9ADXs

I noticed that the last version of E-licenser is buggy for me (VePro does not see it), using a previous version of e-licenser is OK

As I understand, some articulations of Vi version are not presents in Sy version (see att. pic). My choice - to use Vi version with MIR.

I want to roll back to VE PRO 7.0.851 (because the last version frequently unexpectedly freezes (rotating cursor) on closing projects - where I can download the previous version for macOS?

Because I made a lot of settings in pre-update presets, I want just to add to my presets additional slots with cantabile patches. But there are troubles with current slot controller handling:

in Vi1, for example, slot controller
for short articulations starts from F2,
for long articulations starts from E2 (where E2 = Cantabile),
for legato articulations starts from E2 (where E2 = Cantabile),
all others - from F2.

Before the current cantabile update, in Vi2 all slots start from F2. If I want to set it to E2 only for Long notes and Legato, all other slots (shorts, tremolo, etc.) also changes to E2. In other words, I can't manually to reproduce same slot controller settings for Vi2 as for Vi1 for shared expression map control. Only by loading new factory presets (but in this case I will lose my settings).. Is it a Player bug? Or there is a way to set controller note for each slot individually?

+1

 Hi!

Is there a difference between a disabled and disconnected instance of VePro for 1)slave computer CPU 2)host computer CPU? (and for overall performance)

Should I disable instances in large templates, or enough just switch off Vepro in FX slots of VePro tracks?

VSL team, please, make a range of humanizing parameters in SY player same as (not smaller then) in VIPro

Also feature requests for SY player:
Indication of impulse Bypass mode for impulse button on the mixer
Master Impulse bypass button in mixer

Update: as I think, it was a something wrong with ViPro during upgrade to VePro 7. I have deleted ViPro preferences in User/Library/Preferences, and performance of ViPro has returned to normal. I made a test (midifile attached to this post) for setup of 32 dimension strings instruments driven from 32 midi tracks.  (for test all impulses and fx are disabled for all channels inside SY player). MIR was disabled for both cases (in both cases I have an overload if use MIR for this setup)

ViPro version performance:
about 10-15% on stop mode and about 20% while playing
SYnzd version performance:
about 50% on stop mode and about 70% while playing

Is it normal for Synchron player?

Hi!

What is the best way to use Dimension Strings in full divisi, as separate VipPro player with Large set L2 loaded on 32 channels, each placed in MIR without clicks on VePro7 slave 5,1 MacPro 12core X 3.33ghz, 128gb ram, PCI SSD 1200mb/sec?

For now, if I set MIR to bypass, DS used about 90% CPU and plays quite good (with seldom clicks). If I switch MIR on, the system plays with clicks and pops. Different settings of MIR latency and threads per VePro instances are not helping.
I use one 32 ViPro in one VePro instance. Maybe more optimal to use one instance per group? or any additional tricks? Is Synchronized version use less CPU?

Yes, the Vipro sequencer make good trills, but, how to fix a bug with notes H and E (examples in the first message of the topic)? Also, if it's not possible to play natural trills by hands in SY player, this function (or patch) must be improved by VSL (IMHO) for as less as ability in VIPro

In real violins players also keep pressed one string, it can be allowed that one of sounds is not changes :) Ok, but as you can listen examples, the result of playing trill by periodically pressing 2 notes in both cases is very viscosity.. what parameters I must change for the result (speed and clearity) of manual playing of trills was same as if I keep one note pressed or if I use VIPro sequencer? (I found, that humanize delay affects, but sound is sluggish even if I set humanize to 0. If user must to tweak humanize, attack, release only for one articulation, it seems not usable, not 'plug-n-play')

Hi!
I found that trills in DS SYnzd are not such playable as in VIPro version. As you can listen in att. files, the best way to make trill in VIPro version is keep pressed one note and periodically press another note. It is not possible in SYnzd (or what option I need to activate for it?). Also it seems like a bug if I try to play half trill in VIPro sequencer on notes H and E. 

Hm, yes, I can't reproduce it too - sorry. Admins can delete this topic

+1
I also want to have a silent key

Also, there is a difference between humanize delay in SY and ViPro with same values (see and listen att. files)

Hi!

If I want to have a separate track in a sequencer for each player (1st violin 1 player, 1st violin 2 player, etc.)  - need I have a separate instance of Synchron Player for each? (8 instances for 1st violins etc), or it is possible to use one instance for 1st violins and independently play by all players at once?

also question - is autodivisi realized in Sy-version of Dimension strings?

Best regards,
Vadim