Not really sure I get your point here Errikos.
Firstly, it's nice to see that you, like me, know how to orchestrate but recognise the various reasons for using pro-orchestrators.
After that, you seem to contradict yourself, on one side defending Elfman whilst admitting that the orchestration may not be all his own work and then, on the other side, attacking modern composers for using other people's orchestration.
I know that at least some of the orchestration on Batman had to be reworked (it's one of the assignments and examples in the Scott Smalley course) to improve the tone and voice leading in the strings.
The worst of all this is that I'm sure you and I actually have the same aesthetic towards film music and are just arguing semantics at this point. As I've said all along, I love the early Elfman scores however I feel that the sound he created at the time was heavily influenced by his collaborators.
As for another 'hack' who has demanded imitation ... well it depends on how you define hack. I'm sure many people consider Zimmer to be one and he is imitated by a lot of people these days ... including Elfman.
In response to your 'manifesto' I can only say that this is getting noticed. Nearly every major film I've been to see of late I've walked out to hear people in the audience complaining about the weak score.
Oh and thank you William! It's nice to see someone who values scoring independent movies. My only problem is that too many indie directors (in the UK at least) want to sound like Hollywood! At least when I'm not getting paid a lot I can argue my case more strongly.