Good to know and thanks for clarifcation (sorry, I didn't read much carefully).

It definitly doesn't occure on my window 7 system, but constantly on Mac (under different OSXs).

So I suspect it's the graphic card.

Frank

Is it intended by default that you have to pop out (and back in) the MIR-window 

to be able to move the icons around (or change any parameter)? I noticed this weird behavior

since about 1 year, not a big deal but sometimes annoying (I think on mac osx only, but 

I'm not sure...)

Frank

Interesting. The same appearance here (since the penultimate update), but I could imagine it's my old OS -

Win 7 without some newer updates. 

I'm working mostly with long prooved templates, so no problem; otherwise I open the task manager. 

Originally Posted by: andi

...

There will be a Sibelius sound set for the Synchron Strings.

Best regards,
Andi

Much appreciated! 

Best regards

Frank

Originally Posted by: Paul

Hi doubleattack,

Yes, there are very convenient ROOM-MIXES available, with the MID mic (right in front of the ensemble) and a ROOM-MIX of all available microphones. This way you need only one VI / VI Pro instance....

You can go ahead and load those ROOM-MIX Presets for the 1st violins and the cellos right away!

I'm showing the technical details in the little Setup Video right here.

Best, 
Paul

Thanks for the hint and quick reply! I overlooked it since for the synchron percussion these patches are implemented in the custom data folder and you find it in the lower right corner. 

The new Synchronize Control Map Option in Settings are really a huge time saver!  GREAT!

Congratulation! I'm excited!

The VE Pro Presets are really useful but I liked the VI PRO presets for the percussions a lot.

So can we expect some SUR to Stereo VI PRO presets too, or do we have to wait for the synchron player?

Thanks!

I'm wondering about too.

Thank you, VSL - support, especially Paul, for fast helping out! The new version works as expected and flawless!

Best Frank

Same problem here, even working in stand-alone connected with ip-midi. I just gave a message to vsl-support.

I rolled back to v. 13407 and it works fine.

Hello Andi, thanks for your quick reply!

I just downloaded the presets again, and I realised the mistake by myself. It's weird, since I've must been save my "new preset" under download instruments  a n d  woodwind 1 presets. I think, I'm getting old.

Please accept my apologize and thanks again for taking care!

Best Frank 

Do you leave your system in hibernate modus over night? Does your system automatically looking for updates? ...there can be lot of reasons, but it sounds you have to look in this direction...

Frank

The loaded preset for Flute 1 (download instrument or/and woodwind 1) into VI Pro 2 include an A/B Keyswitch inside the range of the instrument. (A6/B6 - on setting middle C to C4).

Using the patch with expressionmap in Cubase leads to no sound on both notes or under some unfortunate circumstances to a midi-feedback, which is uncomfortable to listen to.  

I think, thats a mistake in the preset? Or am I wrong?

kind regards

Frank

Ok, this topic has quite changed...Anyway, back to the original topic: The problems on my window system are solved. I did some updates for Win 7 and gave the newest version of MIR another try - succesful. VE PRO 13045 + MIR 13043 is running smooth as all versions before. So problem solved!

kind regards

Frank

I've already contacted vsl - support and gave them a list about the CPU consumption. Every VE PRO 2 instance took 1,5 % and it stacks up with every new instance. 20 instances = 35%, ways to much obviously.  But the task manager was showing different values  

Now I wan't install the new update anymore on this system. After the last trying out the switch back was possible with system recovery only. The new features seems to affect general settings, since I've got suddenly the same heavy CPU consumption after installing the older MIR Pro version. After recovery all things went fine again, at this time 81 instances loaded with 4,1% CPU usage, playback at buffer 512 mostly 30% - 40% CPU usage.

A crash dump from my try out was send to support too, maybe it includes some more information.

Kind regards

Frank 

Good to know. It seems to affect some systems only, what will it makes even not easier to solve the problem, I suppose.

I've tried lot of different things, but I didn't it get to work here, so I have had to switch back to the older version.

It works very fine on Mac; it doesn't so on my Win system. And that's a pity, cause that's my main workstation, dedicated specially to MIR.

Since version 12844 is very stable  a n d  very efficient on the same system, the new MIRx implementation should be not such a dealbreaker.

It's very nice with MIRx to have such good new starting point's - to make a new template is easy, fast and a funny work. So I much appreciate this big effort vsl has made with this update - and it's without any charging again. But please make it running on Win 7 too!

Best

Frank 

Many thanks Paul, for this quick help! Everything looks fine now and works as expected!

Kind regards

Frank

I switched back to version 12844 - works fine here. (CPU loading same template 1,9%)

Ah, thanks for this information, so I can safe a support ticket.

edit: btw, the task manager shows the normal CPU load (2%-3% using 70 instances of VI PRO 2 with MIR, all Cells disabled on Windows X 58 6 Core HT on, 24 GB RAM) VE PRO 5 shows 20% CPU load.

Thanks, Frank 

Since I have to deal with dry recorded audio material side by side on the VSL library inside MIR: Even a single impulse from the silent stage (maybe for the VSL Convolution Rev, Hybrid Rev would be sometimes  v e r y  useful! 

But not only for this reason: Such a "Silent Stage Impulse" would be useful for balancing the difference of space in the sample recordings itself; naturally the short articulation or specially the pre-recorded phrases of scale runs have more room-information than other samples of the same instrument.

In advance of a impulse from the silent stage we could balance it before sending the signal into MIR, without masking this different with a different MIR venue.  I could suggest it would be helpful to make a mixing-result even more better, for shure for a more dry setup. Theoretically...

Frank

I would suggest to use the group function for multiple mute/bypass. Should be working fine in this way.

Frank 

Thanks a lot for your comprehensive explanation, Dietz! I'm very pleased that there will be a solution using these wonderful recorders inside MIR in the future. Much appreciated!

Kind regards 

Frank

Can we expect an instrument-profile for the recorders implemented in a next MIR update? 

Kind regards

Frank

Ok, speaking to myself, I read this thread after my first post http://community.vsl.co.at/forums/t/35564.aspx

and understand, it still needs some time.

Maybe the announcement leads to some misunderstanding, since it says: "...in the next update."

No hurry, but looking forward to the enhancements! ;-)

Kind regards

Frank 

I didn't find some hints of new features in the last updates so my question:

Does the MIRx features and enhancements implemented already in the last update of MIR Pro (5.1.12684)?

Kind regards 

Frank